An evaluation of supervised and unsupervised classification techniques for marine benthic habitat mapping using multibeam echosounder data

Keyphrases

• Classification Methods 100%
• Unsupervised Classification 100%
• Supervised Classification 100%
• Multibeam Echosounder 100%
• Backscatter 100%
• Marine Benthic Habitats 100%
• Benthic Habitat Mapping 100%
• Bathymetry 50%
• Acoustic Data 50%
• Habitat Map 50%
• Politicians 25%
• Selection Strategy 25%
• Unbiased Estimate 25%
• Process-based 25%
• Environmental Variables 25%
• Feature Selection 25%
• Bathymetry Data 25%
• Rugosity 25%
• Backscatter Data 25%
• Habitat Mapping 25%
• Ground Truth Data 25%
• Bathymetric Derivatives 25%
• Community Structure 25%
• Allocation Disagreements 25%
• Roughness Index 25%
• Horizontal Resolution 25%
• Camera Footprint 25%
• Maximum Likelihood Supervised Classification 25%
• Marine Habitat Mapping 25%
• Conservation Organizations 25%
• Conservation Policy 25%
• Topographic Roughness 25%
• Quantity Allocation 25%
• Quantity Disagreement 25%
• Pairwise Testing 25%
• Faunal Communities 25%
• Vector Index 25%
• Habitat Classification Scheme 25%
• Research Scientists 25%

Earth and Planetary Sciences

• Map 100%
• Evaluation 100%
• Cartography 100%
• Habitat 100%
• Unsupervised Classification 100%
• Supervised Classification 100%
• Accuracy 42%
• Bathymeter 42%
• Selection 28%
• Data Set 28%
• Video 28%
• Agreement 28%
• Acoustic Data 28%
• Information 14%
• Institution 14%
• Amount 14%
• Research 14%
• Investigation 14%
• Area 14%
• Sample 14%
• Difference 14%
• Slope 14%
• Class 14%
• Vector 14%
• Input 14%
• Camera 14%
• Policy 14%
• Estimate 14%
• Coefficient 14%
• Information System 14%
• Conservation 14%
• Footprint 14%
• Scientist 14%
• Allocation 14%
• Community Structure 14%
• Roughness 14%
• Marine Habitat 14%