An exploration of the predictive validity of selection criteria on progress outcomes for pre‐registration nursing programmes—A systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aim
To identify the selection methods currently being used for pre‐registration nursing programmes and to assess the predictive power that these methods have on students' success.

Background
Research into selection methods in nursing education is beginning to emerge, yet it is unclear which methods are most predictive of students' success.

Design
A systematic review of the literature.

Methods
A systematic search of ten electronic databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE Ovid, EMBASE, PROQUEST Health and Medical, PROQUEST Education, COCHRANE Library, Web of Science, ASSIA, SCOPUS and PROSPERO was conducted. The results were expanded by the handsearching of journals, reference lists and grey literature. The PRISMA statement guided the review. Studies published in English between January 2008–March 2020 were eligible for inclusion, and quality assessment was undertaken using the CASP Checklist for Cohort Studies.

Results
Twenty‐five studies met the criteria for inclusion. A range of selection methods was identified including prior academic achievement, admissions tests, interviews, emotional intelligence tests, personal statements and previous healthcare experience. Prior academic achievement and admissions tests appear to be the selection methods most predictive of student success. The evidence surrounding other selection methods such as interviews and personal statements is less conclusive.

Conclusion
Selecting individuals with the appropriate knowledge, interpersonal skills and personal qualities needed to complete an undergraduate nursing programme is an important part of the role of nurse educators. This review shows that a wide variety of selection methods are used across different institutions, some of which are more effective than others in predicting student outcomes.

Relevance to clinical practice
Further research is required to justify the continued use of some commonly used selection methods for undergraduate nursing programmes. Selection models that combine various types of selection criteria with predictive power appear to increase the probability of selecting students that will have successful outcomes.

What does this paper contribute to the wider global clinical community?
The findings of this paper suggest that prior academic achievement and admissions tests are the best indicators of nursing student success in pre‐registration nursing programmes. More evidence is required to justify the continued use of non‐cognitive screening methods such as interviews, psychometric tests and personal statements.
Continued efforts should be made by nursing educators to encourage applications from a wide variety of people including those from underrepresented groups.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Early online date2 Mar 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Mar 2021

Keywords

  • ACADEMIC ATTAINMENT
  • Baccalaureate nursing
  • Education
  • Nursing
  • Progression
  • selection
  • Systematic Review
  • nursing education research
  • clinical competence
  • progress outcomes
  • selection criteria
  • students

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An exploration of the predictive validity of selection criteria on progress outcomes for pre‐registration nursing programmes—A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this