Can we trust “Magnitude-based inference”?

Alan M Nevill, Mark Williams, Colin Boreham, E.S. Wallace, Gareth Davison, Grant Abt, Andrew M Lane, Edward M Winter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Issue number24
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 Nov 2018

Bibliographical note

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for social sciences (2nd ed.).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hopkins, W. G., & Batterham, A. M. (2016). Error rates, decisive outcomes
and publication bias with several inferential methods. Sports Medicine,
46(10), 1563–1573.
Kruschke, J. (2014). Doing bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS,
and Stan (2nd ed.). London: Academic Press.
Nevill, A. M. (1997). Why the analysis of performance variables recorded on
a ratio scale will invariably benefit from a log transformation. Journal of
Sports Sciences, 15, 457–458.
Sainani, K. L. (2018). The problem with” Magnitude-based inference”. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. doi:10.1249/MSS.000 0000000001645.Wasserstein
Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values:
Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70, 129–133.
Wilkinson, L.; Task Force on Statistical Inference, APA Board of Scientific
Affairs. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines
and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 564–594.
Winter, E. M., Abt, G. A., & Nevill, A. M. (2014). Metrics of meaningfulness as
opposed to sleights of significance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32, 901–902.

Cite this