Ice is commonly used after acute muscle strains but there are no clinical studies of its effectiveness. By comparison, there are a number of basic scientific studies on animals which show that applying ice after muscle injury has a consistent effect on a number of important cellular and physiological events relating to recovery. Some of these effects may be temperature dependant; most animal studies induce significant reductions in muscle temperature at the injury site. The aim of this short report was to consider the cooling magnitudes likely in human models of muscle injury and to discuss its relevance to the clinical setting. Current best evidence shows that muscle temperature reductions in humans are moderate in comparison to most animal models, limiting direct translation to the clinical setting. Further important clinical questions arise when we consider the heterogenous nature of muscle injury in terms of injury type, depth and insulating adipose thickness. Contrary to current practice, it is unlikely that a 'panacea' cooling dose or duration exists in the clinical setting. Clinicians should consider that in extreme circumstances of muscle strain (eg, deep injury with high levels of adipose thickness around the injury site), the clinical effectiveness of cooling may be significantly reduced.
Bibliographical noteReference text: 1. Reurink G, Goudswa GJ, Tol JL, et al. Therapeutic interventions for acute hamstring injuries: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med 2012;46:103–9.[Abstract/FREE Full text]
2. Bleakley CM, Costello JT, Glasgow PD. Should athletes return to sport after applying ice?: a systematic review of the effect of local cooling on functional performance. Sports Med 2012;42:69–87.[CrossRef][Medline][Web of Science]
3. Bleakley CM, Glasgow P, MacAuley DC. PRICE needs updating, should we call the POLICE? Br J Sports Med 2012;46:220–1.[FREE Full text]
4. Bleakley CM, Glasgow P, Webb MJ. Cooling an acute muscle injury: can basic scientific theory translate into the clinical setting? Br J Sports Med 2012;46:296–8.[Abstract/FREE Full text]
5. Khan KM, Scott A. Mechanotherapy: how physical therapists' prescription of exercise promotes tissue repair. Br J Sports Med 2009;43:247–52.[Abstract/FREE Full text]
6. Bleakley CM, McDonough SM, MacAuley DC. Some conservative strategies are effective when added to controlled mobilisation with external support after acute ankle sprain: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother 2008;54:7–20.[Medline][Web of Science]
7. Leeder J, Gissane C, van Someren K, et al. Cold water immersion and recovery from strenuous exercise: a meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2012;46:233–40.[FREE Full text]
8. Sackett DL. Clinician-trialist rounds: 6. Testing for blindness at the end of your trial is a mug's game. Clin Trials 2011;8:674–6.[FREE Full text]
9. Brukner P, Blair S, Bahr R, Cook J, Crossley K, McConnell JSherrington C. Integrating evidence into clinical practice to make quality decisions. In: Brukner P, Blair S, Bahr R, Cook J, Crossley K, McConnell J, eds. Brukner & Khan's Clinical Sports Medicine. Fourth edition. Sydney: McGraw Hill 2012:11–13.