of the paper. The aim of this paper is to report a survey of midwives’ views on the use of technology in assisting births.Background. The research was designed to provide a deeper understanding of the integration of technology into midwives’ practice and to identify and examine aspects of training needs.Methods. Over 400 midwives responded to a questionnaire seeking information on their experiences and perceived competence with labour ward technology, with a particular focus on the use of cardiotocograph machines (CTGs) for electronic foetal monitoring. The survey sought views on the extent to which midwives trust the technology, their perceived levels of training and competence, their awareness of policy relating to technological intervention and the issue of women’s choice in whether the progress of their delivery is technologically monitored.Findings. The majority of midwives in this survey trust the use of technology but have concerns about issues of safety in relation to potential faults, and to their perceived lack of training in technology usage. The majority also indicated that they prefer a nontechnological birth although many point to the benefits of technological support when difficulties are encountered. The use of technology is seen as multi-professional and there was much support among the respondents for multi-disciplinary training in the use of technologies in future curricula.Conclusions. If the various findings of this sample survey were to be consolidated for midwives as a whole, they suggest that provisions for continuing professional development may need to address technological awareness and competence in a more focused manner than is discernible at present.
Reference text: Bannon E. (1998) Women’s Knowledge of and Preference for Induction of Labour. Unpublished MSc Thesis, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland.2Benner P. & Wrubel J. (1989) The Primacy of Caring. Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA.3CESDI (1996) Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy Northern Ireland 1994 and 1995, Second Report of the Regional Confidential Enquiry Group. DHSS Publication, Belfast, Northern Ireland.4CESDI (1998) Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy Third Annual Report Northern Ireland 1996–1997. DHSS Publication, Belfast, Northern Ireland.5CESDI (2000) Confidential Enquiry into Stillbirths and Deaths in Infancy England 1998–1999. DoH Publication, Maternal and Child Health Research Consortium, London.6Fitter M. (1986) The Impact of New Technology on Workers and Patients in the Health Services. Physical and Psychological Stress. Office for Official Publications of the European communities, Luxembourg.7Hately W., Case J., Campbell S. (1995) Establishing the death of an embryo ultrasound: report of a public inquiry with recommendations. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology 5, 353–357. Direct Link:AbstractPDF(579K)8Lynn J. (1991) Are you switched on to your patients. Nursing 5, 31–31. 9McConnell E.A. (1989) Technology-orientated patient care. Nursing World Journal 15, 1–3. 10MDD (1994) Doing No Harm Medical Devices Directorate. Department of Health and Central Office of Information, DNHI, London.11Northrop C.E. (1984) Status of recent nursing litigation. Nursing Economic 2, 423–427.PubMed,ChemPort12Pelletier D. (1995) Diploma prepared nurses’ use of technological equipment in clinical practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing 21, 6–14.Direct Link:AbstractPDF(824K)References13RCOG/RCM (1999) Towards Safer Childbirth: Minimum Standards for the Organisation of Labour Wards: Report of a Joint Working Party. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and Royal College of Midwives, London.14Van