Nationalist Reframing of the Finnish and Swedish Welfare States – The Nexus of Nationalism and Social Policy in Far‐right Populist Parties

Johan Nordensvard, Markus Ketola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)


The rise of right wing populist parties in the Nordic countries is slowly redefining the Nordic social democratic discourse of the universal and egalitarian welfare state. The nexus of nationalism and social policy has been explored in regions and countries such as Quebec, Scotland, Belgium and the United Kingdom but the change of discourse in the Nordic countries has received less attention. Taking the case of Sweden and Finland, this paper argues that Nordic populism does not question the redistributive welfare state per se as many other European neo-liberal far-right parties have done. Instead it reframes welfare state as being linked to a sovereign and exclusive Swedish and Finnish political community with distinct national boundaries. Although Sweden and Finland largely share a common welfare nation state discourse, the article also points to important differences in the way this discourse is able to frame the welfare nation state where access to and the design of social services are no longer universal and egalitarian but based around ethnicity. The article aims to demonstrate this through an analysis of the welfare discourses of two populist parties: the Sweden Democrats and the True Finns.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)356-375
JournalSocial Policy and Administration
Issue number3
Early online date31 Jul 2014
Publication statusPublished - 3 May 2015

Bibliographical note

Reference text: Aden, S. (2009), Ikuisesti pakolaisina? Maahanmuuttikeskustelu Suomen somalialaisten näkökulmasta. In S. Keskinen, A. Rastas and S. Tuori (eds), En ole rasisti, mutta... Maahanmuutosta, monikulttuurisuudesta ja kritiikistä, Tampere: Vastapaino, pp. 25-32.

Alesina A. and Glaeser, E. (2004), Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Anderson, B.R.O. (1983), Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.

Anttonen, A. and Sipilä, J. (2000) Suomalaista Sosiaalipolitiikkaa, Jyväskylä: Vastapaino.

Arter, D. (2010), The breakthrough of another West European populist radical right party? The case of the True Finns, Government and Opposition, 45, 4: 484-504.

Banting, K. (2005), Canada: National-building in a federal welfare state. In H. Obinger, S. Leibfried and F. G. Castles (eds), Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European Experiences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Béland, D. (2005), The Politics of Social Policy Language, Social Policy & Administration, 45, 1: 1-18.

Béland, D. (2009), Gender, Ideational Analysis, and Social Policy, Social Politics, 16, 4: 558-81.

Béland, D. and Cox, R. H. (2011), Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, NewYork, NY: Oxford University Press.

Béland, D and Lecours, D. (2005), The Politics of Territorial Solidarity: Nationalism and Social Policy Reform in Canada, the United Kingdom and Belgium, Comparative Political Studies, 38, 6: 676-703.

Béland, D and Lecours, D. (2008), Nationalism and Social Policy: The Politics of Territorial Solidarity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Betz HG, and Johnson C. (2004), Against the current – stemming the tide: the nostalgic ideology of the contemporary radical populist right, Journal of Political Ideology, 9, 3: 311-27.

Bloch, A. (2008), Refugees in the UK Labour Market: The contention between economic integration and policy-led labour market restriction, Journal of Social Policy 37, 1: 21-36.

Blyth, M. (1997), Moving the Political Middle: Redefining the Boundaries of State Action, Political Quarterly, 68, 3: 231-40.

Blyth, M. (2002), Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Boychuk, G. (2008), National Health Insurance in the United States and Canada: Race, Territory, and the Roots of Difference, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Brockmann, M. and Fisher, M. (2001), Older Migrants and Social Care in Austria, Journal of European Social Policy, 11, 4: 353-62.
Brubaker, W.R. (1992), Citizenship and Nationhood in France and Germany, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Burgoon, B., Koster, F. and van Egmond, M. (2012), Support for redistribution and the paradox of immigration, Journal of European Social Policy, 22, 3: 288-304.
Cox, R. H. (2001), The Social Construction of an Imperative: Why Welfare Reform Happened in Denmark and the Netherlands but Not in Germany, World Politics, 53, 3: 463-98.

Durnova, A and Zittoun, P. (2010), Introduction: Interpretive policy analysis in a French setting. The Fifth Interpretive Policy Analysis Conference, Grenoble, June 2010, Critical Policy Studies, 5, 2: 103-105.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Evans, J., Arzheimer, K., Baldini, G., Bjorklund, T., Carter, E. et al. (2001), Comparative mapping of extreme right electoral dynamics: an overview of EREPS, European Political Science 1, 1: 42–53.

Faist, T. (1994), Immigration, integration, and the ethnicization of politics, European Journal
of Political Research, 25, 4: 439-459.

Gerdes, C. (2011), The Impact of Immigration on the Size of Government: Empirical Evidence from Danish Municipalities, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113, 1: 74-92.

Hall, P. A. (1993), Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain, Comparative Politics, 25, 3: 275-96.

Halla-Aho, J. (2006), Monikulttuurisuus ja nainen. (Accessed 10 April 2013).

Hansen, R. and King, D. (2001), Eugenic Ideas, Political Interests, and Policy Variance: Immigration and Sterilization Policy in Britain and the U.S., World Politics, 53, 2: 237-63.

Hjerm, M. and Schnabel, A. (2012), How much heterogeneity can the welfare state endure? The influence of heterogeneity on attitudes to the welfare state. Nations and Nationalism, 18, 2: 346-369.

Johansson, H. and Hvinden, B. (2007), Nordic activation reforms in a European context: a distinct universalistic model. In B. Hvinden and H. Johansson (eds), Citizenship in Nordic Welfare States: Dynamics of Choice, Duties and Participation in a Changing Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 53-67.

Kestilä, E. and Söderlund, P. (2007), Local determinants of radical right-wing voting: The case of the Norwegian progress party, West European Politics, 30, 3: 549-57.

Kpessa, M., Béland, D. and Lecours, A. (2011), Nationalism, development, and social policy: The politics of nation-building in sub-Saharan Africa, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34, 12: 2115-2133.

Larsen, C.A. (2011), Ethnic Heterogeneity and Public Support for Welfare: Is the American Experience Replicated in Britain, Sweden and Denmark? Scandinavian Political Studies, 34, 4: 332-53.

Leibfried, S. and Pierson, P. (2000), Social policy: Left to courts or markets. In H. Wallace and W. Wallace (eds), Policy-making in the European Union, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press: pp. 267-89.
Mau, S. and Burkhardt, C. (2009), Migration and welfare state solidarity in Western Europe, Journal of European Social Policy, 19, 3: 213-29.
McEwen, N. (2006), Nationalism and the State: Welfare and Identity in Scotland and
Quebec, Brussels: Peter Lang.

McVeigh, R. (2007), The ‘Final Solution’: Reformism Ethnicity Denial and the Politics
of Anti-Travellerism in Ireland, Social Policy and Society, 7, 1: 91-102.

Nordensvärd, J. (2010), The Consumer Metaphor versus the Citizen Metaphor in Education Policy. In M. Molesworth, E. Nixon and R. Scullions (eds). The Marketisation of Higher Education: The Student as Consumer, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 157-169.

Obinger, H., Leibfried, S. and Castles, F. (2005), Old and new politics in federal welfare states. In S. Leibfried, H. Obinger and F. Castles (eds), Federalism and the welfare state. New World and European experiences Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 307-353.

Padamsee, T. (2009), Culture in Connection: Re-Contextualizing Ideational Processes in the Analysis of Policy Development, Social Politics, 16, 4: 413-45.

Perussuomalaiset (1995), Yleisohjelma. (Accessed 10 April 2013).

Perussuomalaiset (2009), Perussuomalaisten EU-vaaliohjelma 2009. (Accessed 10 April 2013).

Perussuomalaiset (2011a), Perussuomalaisten eduskuntavaaliohjelma 2011 (Accessed 10 April 2013).

Perussuomalaiset (2011b), The True Finns´ election programme for the parliamentary election 2011 – summary. (Accessed 10 April 2013).

Raunio, T. (2008), The difficult task of opposing Europe: the Finnish party politics of Euroscepticism. In A. Szczerbiak and P. A. Taggart (eds), Opposing Europe? The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism vol. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 168-80.

Rothstein B. (2001), The Universal Welfare State as a Social Dilemma, Rationality and Society, 13, 2: 213-33.

Rothstein, B., and Stolle, D. (2003), Social capital, impartiality and the welfare state: An institutional approach. In M. Hooghe and D. Stolle (eds), Generating social capital, New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 191-210.

Rothstein, B. and Uslaner, E.M. (2005), All for One: Equality, Corruption, and Social Trust. World Politics 58, 1: 41-72.

Rydgren, J. (2003), The Populist Challenge: Political Protest and Ethno-nationalist
Mobilization in France. New York: Berghahn Books.

Rydgren, J. (2005), Radical right-wing populism in Sweden and Denmark, Beer Sheva, The Centre for the Study of European Politics and Society

Rydgren, J. (2007), Explaining the Emergence of Radical Right-Wing Populist Parties: Case of Denmark, West European Politics, 27, 3: 474-502.
Sainsbury, D. (2006), Immigrants’ social rights in comparative perspective: welfare regimes, forms in immigration and immigration policy regimes, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 3: 229-44.
Spinney, A. and Nethery, A. (2013), ‘Taking our houses’: Perceptions of the impact of asylum seekers, refugees and new migrants on housing assistance in Melbourne, Social Policy and Society, 12, 2: 179-89.
Stephens, J. D. (1996), The Scandinavian Welfare States: Achievements, Crisis, and Prospects. In G. Esping-Andersen (ed.), Welfare States in Transition. London: Sage, pp. 32-65.

Svenska Statistiska Centralbyrån (2012), Grundtabeller årsmedeltal 2012, Stockholm: Statistiska centralbyrån. (Accessed 28 February 2014).

Svenska Statistiska Centralbyrån (2014), Population Statistics. (Accessed 28 February 2014).

Sverigedemokraterna (2002), Partiprogram 1999 med justeringar 2002. (Accessed May 2013).

Sverigedemokraterna (2010), 99 förslag för ett bättre Sverige : Sverigedemokraternas kontrakt med väljarna 2010 – 2014. (Accessed May 2013).

Sverigedemokraterna (2011a), Sverigedemokraternas principprogram 2011. (Accessed 5 March 2013).

Sverigedemokraterna (2011b), Arbetsmarknadspolitiskt inriktningsprogram. (Accessed 5 March 2013).

Sverigedemoraterna (2012), Stora besparingar till följd av minskad invandring. (Accessed on 5 March 2013).

Szczerbiak, A. and Taggart, P. A. (2008), Opposing Europe? The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism Vol. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Taylor-Gooby, P. (2005), Is the Future American? Can Left Politics Preserve EuropeanWelfare States from Erosion through Growing ‘Racial’ Diversity? Journal of Social Policy, 34, 4: 661-72.

Tilastokeskus (2014), ‘Population’. (Accessed 27 February 2014).

Wagner, A. (2004), Redefining citizenship for the 21st century: from the National Welfare State to the UN Global Compact, International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 4: 278-86.

Wagner, P. and Zimmermann, B. (2003), ‘Nation. Die Konstitution einer politischen Ordnung als Verantwortungsgemeinschaft’. In S. Lessenich (ed.) Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Grundbegriffe.Historische und aktuelle Diskurse. Frankfurt a.M./New York, NY: Campus, pp. 243 -266.

Åkesson, J. (2009), Muslimerna är vårt största utländska hot, Aftonbladet 19 October.


  • Welfare state
  • Populist parties
  • Framing
  • Nationalism
  • Nation state


Dive into the research topics of 'Nationalist Reframing of the Finnish and Swedish Welfare States – The Nexus of Nationalism and Social Policy in Far‐right Populist Parties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this