Abstract
In 1994 Brooks and Sherrick showed that both the rod-and-frame effect and frame-and-spot-induced motion increase as the inducing frame is made larger. This suggests that change in perceived spatial orientation causes induced motion. Here it is argued that the rod-and-frame effect is more appropriately compared with induced rotation, which differs from frame-and-spot-induced motion in a number of ways. It is argued that the rod-and-frame effect may inhibit induced rotation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 641-642 |
| Journal | Perceptual and Motor Skills |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - Apr 1995 |