Custom acetabular components are proposed to achieve uniform cement mantles, even in irregular acetabula presented at revision, in order to enhance fixation. One aim of developing custom components was to permit pressurization of bone cement by the components at insertion and maintain the pressure during polymerization. A model acetabulum was set up for the insertion of standard, flanged and custom components under constant force. Cement pressure was measured at the floor of the acetabulum by means of a piezoelectric diaphragm transducer. Polythene tubes were inserted in the model acetabular walls to estimate penetration of cement into cancellous bone.Insertion of the standard and flanged components caused cement pressures up to 106 kPa which decayed to less than 21 kPa as cement escaped at the rim and the components came into contact with the acetabulum. The custom component maintained a pressure of over 60 kPa during polymerization from an initial pressure of 105 kPa and examination of cement mantles on removal showed no evidence of contact. The custom component also showed enhanced penetration of cement, especially around the rim of the acetabulum. It is concluded that the custom component design achieves higher cement pressures and that better fixation will result.
|Journal||Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Mar 1993|
Bibliographical noteReference text: 1 Charnley, J. The bonding of prostheses to bone by cement. J. Bone
Jt Surg.. 1964,46-B, 518.
2 Cruen, T. A., Markolf, K. L. and Amstutz, H. C. The effects of
lamination and blood entrapment on the strength of acrylic bone
cement. Clin. Orthop. Related Rex, 1976, 119, 250.
3 Lee, A. J. C., Ling, R. S. M. and Vangala, S. S. Some clinically
relevant variables affecting the mechanical behaviour of bone
cement. Arch. Orthop. Traumatic Surg., 1978, 92, I.
4 Lee, A. J. C. and Ling, R. S. M. A device to improve the extrusion
of bone cement into the bone of the acetabulum in the replacement
of the hip joint. Biomed. Engng, 1974, 9, 1.
5 Charnley, J. Long term radiological results. In Low friction arthroplasty
of the hip, Vol. 94,1979 (Springer Verlag, Berlin).
6 Shelley, P. and Wroblewski, B. M. Socket design and cement pressurisation
in the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. J. Bone dr Sury.,
7 Chua, K. T. Manufacture of customised sockets for hip joint
replacements. MSc thesis, The Queen’s University of Belfast,
8 Oh, I., Sander, T. W. and Treharne, R. W. Total hip acetabular cup
flange design and its effect on cement fixation. Clin. Orthop. Relared
Res., 1985,195, 304.
9 Beverland, D. E., Kernohan, W. G., Nixon, J. R., Orr, J. F. and
Watson, P. The manufacture and evaluation of custom acetabular
sockets. IMechE Conference on Joint replacements in the IYYOs,
1992, paper C441/002, pp. 65-68 (Mechanical Engineering Publications,
- hip replacement