Technology could support the self-management of long-term health conditions suchas chronic pain. This article describes an evaluation of SMART2, a personalised selfmanagementsystem incorporating activity planning and review, feedback on behaviour- andacceptance-based therapeutic exercises. Method: The SMART2 system was evaluated over afour-week trial in the homes of people in chronic pain. At conclusion, participants wereinterviewed to understand the experience of using and living with the SMART2 system as atherapeutic tool. Results: Qualitative analysis of the interviews found that participants liked thesystem and reported making associated changes to their behaviour. Goal setting and feedbackwere the most useful elements of the system. A third key and unexpected element was that bysimulating some of the functions of a therapist, SMART2 also simulated some of the process ofinteracting with a therapist. Conclusions: People in chronic pain may experience positiveoutcomes when using a self-management system designed for behaviour change. Furthermore,some of the supportive aspects of the therapeutic context can be elicited by self-managementtechnologies.
|Journal||Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Jan 2015|
Bibliographical noteReference text: 1. Breivik H, Collet B, Ventafridda V, et al. Survey of chronic pain in
Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain
2006;10:287–333.2. Eccleston C, Williams ACDC, Morley S. Psychological therapies for
the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(2):CD007407.
3. Khan N, Bower P, Rogers A. Guided self-help in primary care
mental health: meta-synthesis of qualitative studies of patient
experience. Br J Psychiatry 2007;191:206–11.
4. Andersson G. Using the internet to provide cognitive behaviour
therapy. Behav Res Ther 2009;47:175–80.
5. Murray E, Burns J, See TS, et al. Interactive health communication
applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database
Syst Rev 2005;(4):CD004274.
6. Car J, Huckvale K, Hermens H. Telehealth for long term conditions.
7. Currell R, Urquhart C, Wainwright P, Lewis R. Telemedicine versus
face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health
care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(2):CD002098.
8. Wantland DJ, Portillo CJ, Holzemer WL, et al. The effectiveness of
web-based vs. non-web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of
behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res 2004;6:e40.
9. Bender JL, Radhakrishnan A, Diorio C, et al. Can pain be managed
through the internet? A systematic review of randomized controlled
trials. Pain 2011;152:1740–50.
10. Palermo TM, Wilson AC, Peters M, et al. Randomized controlled
trial of an internet-delivered family cognitive-behavioral therapy
intervention for children and adolescents with chronic pain. Pain
11. Velleman S, Stallard P, Richardson T. A review and meta-analysis of
computerized cognitive behaviour therapy for the treatment of pain
in children and adolescents. Child Care Hlth Dev 2010;36:465–72.
12. Ritterband LM, Thorndike FP, Cox DJ, et al. A behaviour change
model for internet interventions. Ann Behav Med 2009;38:18–27.
13. Newell AF, Gregor P. User sensitive inclusive design – in search of a
new paradigm. Proceedings of A.C.M. Conference on Universal
Usability. Washington, DC; 2000:39–44.
14. Rosser BA, McCullagh P, Davies R, et al. Technology-mediated
therapy for chronic pain management: the challenges of adapting
behaviour change interventions for delivery with pervasive communication
technology. Telemed J E Health 2011;17:211–16.
15. Eng TR, Gustafson DH, Henderson J, et al. Introduction to
evaluation of interactive health communication applications.
Science Panel on Interactive Communication and Health. Am J
Prev Med 1999;16:10–15.
16. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res
17. Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, et al. Acceptance and commitment
therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther 2006;44:
18. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief
Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994;23:129–38.
19. McCracken LM, Volwes KE, Eccleston C. Acceptance of chronic
pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method. Pain
20. Brooke J. SUS: a ‘‘quick and dirty usability scale’’. In: Jordan PW,
Thomas B, Weerdmeester BA, McClelland AL, eds. Usability
evaluation in industry. London: Taylor and Francis; 1996:189–94.
21. Borkovec TD, Nau SD. Credibility of analogue therapy rationales.
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1972;3:257–60.
22. Locke EA, Latham AP. Building a practically useful theory of goal
setting and task motivation. Am Psychol 2002;57:705–17.
23. Warsi A, LaValley MP, Wang PS, et al. Arthritis self-management
programs: a meta-analysis of the effect on pain and disability.
Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:2207–13.
24. Newman S, Steed L, Mulligan K. Self-management interventions for
chronic illness. Lancet 2004;364:1523–37.
25. Griffiths C, Foster G, Ramsay J, et al. How effective are patient (lay
led) education programmes for chronic disease? BMJ 2007;334:
26. Rosser BA, Vowles KE, Keogh E, et al. Technologically assisted
behaviour change: a systematic review of studies of novel
technologies for the management of chronic illness. J Telemed
27. Reeves B, Nass C. The media equation: how people treat computers,
television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press; 1996.
28. Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT. On seeing human: a three-factor
theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev 2007;114:864–86.