Research Priorities for the Therapy Professions in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland: A comparison of findings from a Delphi Consultation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Allied health professions constitute alarge and growing proportion of the healthcare workforce.As a collective they are involved in complex careinterventions often within multidisciplinary teams andincreasingly in community settings. Even though reliableinformation is lacking, some professions do appearto have developed an active research culture, whereasothers are more limited in terms of research. PURPOSE:This paper reports on the comparative findings of twoDelphi studies, one in Northern Ireland and one in theRepublic of Ireland, undertaken between 2008 and2011. The aim of both studies was to identify researchpriorities for six of the therapy professions. METHOD: Aclassic Delphi approach was used involving expertpanels from the therapy disciplines, service users, andkey stakeholders. Results: Both studies provided richsources of data. Areas of commonality included theevaluation of practice generally and specific interventionscommon to each of the professions. More effectiveservice management and health promotionresearch were also identified as important in both countries.CONCLUSIONS: As the global number of alliedhealth professionals increases, along with the need forthem to support their practice with sound evidence, thefindings from this paper have international implications.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-109
JournalJournal of Allied Health
Volume43
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2014

Bibliographical note

Reference text: REFERENCES
1. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New
Health System for the Twenty-first Century. Washington DC:
The National Academies Press; 2001.
2. Needle JJ, Petchey RP, Benson J, et al. The role of allied health
professionals in health promotion (Report No. Final). London:
NIHR Service Delivery and Organisation programme; 2011.
3, Scottish Executive. Allied Health Professions Action Plan
Research and Development. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive;
2004.
4. Lunday J. The need for visibility and engagement of AHPs in
the global health agenda. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2009; 16(3): 128–129.
5. National Commission on Allied Health. J Allied Health. 1996;
25(1):1–137.
6. Higher Education Funding Council for England. Research in
Nursing and Allied Health Professions. Report of the Task
Group 3 to HEFCE and the Department of Health. Bristol:
HEFCE; 2001.
7. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Priorities for Physiotherapy
Research in the UK. London: Chartered Society of Physiotherapy;
2002. Available at: http://www.csp.org.uk/director/effec
tivepractice/research/priorities.cfm. Accessed Nov 14, 2012.
8. American Occupational Therapy Foundation. Research Priorities
and Parameters of Practice for Occupational therapy.
Bethesda, MD: AOTF; 2003.
9. Bannigan K, Boniface G, Doherty P, et al. The nature and value
of research priority setting in healthcare: case study of the
POTTER project. J Market Manage Healthcare. 2009; 2(3): 293–
304.
10. College of Occupational Therapists. Building the evidence for
occupational therapy: priorities for research. London: College of
Occupational Therapists; 2007.
11. Cusick A, Albornoz G, Bissett M. Occupational therapy
research evidence and priorities in mental health. Australia: OT
Australia 23rd National Conference & Exhibition; 2008.
12. Bannigan K, Boniface G, Doherty P, et al. The POTTER Project:
Final Report. London: College of Occupational Therapists;
2006.
13. Castellanos VH, Myers EF, Shanklin CW. The ADA’s Research
Priorities Contribute to a Bright Future for Dietetics Professionals.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2004; 104(4): 678–681.
14. British Dietetic Association. The British Dietetic Association
Research Strategy. Birmingham: British Dietetic Association; 2008.
15. Podiatric Research Forum. Real time Delphi exercise for PRF meeting
13 January 2003 London: Podiatric Research Forum; 2003.
16. Department of Health and Children. Quality and Fairness: A
Health System for You. Dublin: Department of Health and Children;
2001.
17. Centre for Prehosptial Research. A national prehospital
research strategy. Ireland: University of Limerick; 2008.
18. McKenna HP, Ashton S, Keeney S. Barriers to evidence based
practice. J Adv Nurs. 2004; 45(2): 178–189.
19. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna HP. Research guidelines for the
Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000; 32(4): 1008–1015.
20. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP. Consulting the oracle: ten
lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. J
Adv Nurs. 2006; 53(2): 1–8.
21. McKenna H, Keeney S. Delphi Studies In: Watson R, Keady J,
McKenna HP (eds) Researching Nursing Practice. London: Blackwell
Publishing; 2008.
22. McKenna HP. The Delphi Technique: a worthwhile approach
for nursing? J Adv Nurs. 1994; 19: 1221–1225.
23. McKenna H, McDonough SM, McDonnell R, et al. The identification
of research priorities for therapy professions in Ireland.
Ireland: Department of Health and Children, Health Research
Board; 2010. Available at: http://www.hrb.ie/publications/
hrb-publication/publications//520/. Accessed Apr 10, 2013.
24. McDonough SM, McKenna H, Keeney S, et al. The identification
of research priorities for therapy professions in Northern
Ireland. Northern Ireland: HSC Public Health Agency Research
and Development Division, Northern Ireland, and The Health
Research Board, Ireland; 2011. Available at: http://www.public
health.hscni.net/sites/default/files/NI_Delphi_Study_Execu
tive_Summary.pdf. Accessed Apr 10, 2013.
25. Diabetes UK. Putting Feet First 2009. Available at: www.dia
betes.org.uk/Documents/Reports/Putting_Feet_first_010709.
pdf. Accessed Apr 10, 2013.
26. National Minimum Skills Framework 2011. Available at: www.
diabetes.org.uk/Documents/Professionals/Education%20and%
20skills/NMSF_16Feb2011.pdf. Accessed Apr 10, 2013.
27. NICE CG119: Diabetic Foot Problems–NICE Clinical Guidelines.
2011. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/
CG119. Accessed Apr 5, 2014.
28. Department of Health. National Stroke Strategy. London:
Department of Health; 2007.
29. Early Language Development Programme (ELDP). London:
ELDP Talking Point; 2013. Available at: http://eldp.talking
point.org.uk/. Accessed June 26, 2013.
30. Royal College of Speech and Language Therapists. RCSLT
Resource Manual for Commissioning and Planning Services for
SLCD: Dysphagia. 2009. Available at: http://www.rcslt.org/
speech_and_language_therapy/commissioning. Accessed Apr
10, 2013.
31. Marsh K, Bertranou E, Suominen S, Venkatachalam M. An economic
evaluation of speech and language therapy. London:
Matrix Evidence, 2010. Available at: http://www.rcslt.
org/giving_voice/matrix_report. Accessed June 29, 2013.
32. Northern Ireland Assembly. Obesity Inquiry Research Paper.
Research and Library Services Research Paper 97/09. Belfast:
Northern Ireland Assembly; 2009.
33. DHSSPSNI. Improving Health and Well Being through Positive
Partnerships—A Strategy for the Allied Health Professions in
Northern Ireland 2012–2017. Belfast, DHSSPSNI, 2012.
34. DHSSPSNI. Transforming Your Care—A Review of Health and
Social Care in Northern Ireland. Belfast, DHSSPSNI, 2011

Keywords

  • Delphi
  • therapies professions
  • podiatry
  • occupational therapy
  • nutrition
  • dietetics
  • physiotherapy
  • speech and language
  • orthoptics
  • stakeholders
  • service users
  • consensus
  • priorities

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Research Priorities for the Therapy Professions in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland: A comparison of findings from a Delphi Consultation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this