Tapping into authentic presence: key components arisingfrom a concept analysis of online breastfeeding support

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
38 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background. The internet is widely used by women to guide infant-feeding decisions and practice, but there is no clearunderstanding of women’s self-directed use of the internet to support breastfeeding.Aim. To conceptualise online breastfeeding support.Methods. With ethical approval, a mixed methods triangulated study was undertaken based on a concept analysis that usedan eight-step framework. The study was designed in three phases – Phase 1: a concept analysis to identify components ofonline breastfeeding support; Phase 2: testing of tentative components arising from the concept analysis through observationof breastfeeding-related online discussions (based on 126 threads containing 1230 messages generated by 510 individuals);Phase 3: confirmation of the resultant model through online interviews with 12 women.Findings. In total, 16 components of online breastfeeding support emerged indicating that women who engaged in this practicehad antecedents of: a breastfeeding goal; a breastfeeding query or interest in discussion/debate; inadequate face-to-face supportor seeks additional/optional support; willingness to seek and offer support online. Attributes manifested as a tailored menu ofsupport or enablement of debate by more experienced others, in an accessible, responsive, optionally anonymous environmentsustained by indirect reciprocity. Confirmed consequences were: reconstruction of breastfeeding experience; impact onbreastfeeding outcomes and other aspects of parenting; becoming expert and enabling face-to-face support. Together, thesecomponents constitute an authentic presence of support created by a global community of breastfeeding women.Conclusion. To our knowledge, this study is unique and has potential to impact on strategies targeting maternal and childhealth at a national and international level. The study provides new theoretical knowledge about women’s behaviour and usageof online support to enable them to achieve desired breastfeeding goal(s). This study provides empirical evidence of ‘womangenerated’,sustainable, online breastfeeding support and opens the doors for targeted public health research investment.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)76-83
JournalEvidence Based Midwifery
Volume13
Issue number3
Early online date5 Feb 2017
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 5 Feb 2017

Bibliographical note

Reference text: Barclay L, Longman J, Schmied V, Sheehan A, Rolfe M, Burns E, Fenwick J.
(2012) The professionalising of breastfeeding: where are we a decade on?
Midwifery 28(3): 281-90.
Bolling K, Grant C, Hamlyn B, Thornton A. (2007) Infant-feeding survey
2005. A survey conducted on behalf of The Information Centre for
Health and Social Care and the UK health departments by BMRB Social
Research. The Information Centre: London.
Callaghan JE, Lazard L. (2012) ‘Please don’t put the whole dang thing out
there!’: a discursive analysis of internet discussions around infant feeding.
Psychology and Health 27(8): 938-55.
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. The Stationary Office: London. See:
legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/section/29 (accessed 10 August 2015).
Coursaris CK, Liu M. (2009) An analysis of social support exchanges in
online HIV/AIDS self-help groups. Computers in Human Behavior
25(4): 911-8.
Cross-Barnet C, Augustyn M, Gross S, Resnik A, Paige D. (2012) Long-term
breastfeeding support: failing mothers in need. Maternal and Child Health
Journal 16(9): 1926-32.
Ekeh PP. (1974) Social exchange theory: the two traditions. Harvard
University Press: Cambridge.
Esquivel A, Meric-Bernstam F, Bernstam EV. (2006) Accuracy and selfcorrection
of information received from an internet breast cancer list:
content analysis. British Medical Journal 332(7547): 939-42.
Eysenbach G, Köhler C. (2002) How do consumers search for and appraise
health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus
groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. British Medical Journal
324(7337): 573-7.
Eysenbach G, Powell J, Englesakis M, Rizo C, Stern A. (2004) Health-related
virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of
the effects of online peer-to-peer interactions. British Medical Journal
328(7449): 1166.
Ferguson T, Frydman G. (2004) The first generation of e-patients: these newmedical colleagues could provide sustainable healthcare solutions. British
Medical Journal 328(7449): 1148-9.
Fox S, Duggan M. (2013) Health online 2013. See: pewinternet.
org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013 (accessed 10 August 2015).
Freelon DG. (2010) ReCal: intercoder reliability calculation as a web service.
International Journal of Internet Science 5(1): 20-33.
Giglia R, Binns C. (2014) The effectiveness of the internet in improving
breastfeeding outcomes: a systematic review. Journal of Human Lactation
30(2): 156-60.
Gill SL. (2001) The little things: perceptions of breastfeeding support. Journal
of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing 30(4): 401-9.
Gillen P, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG. (2004) A concept analysis of bullying in
midwifery. Evidence Based Midwifery 2(2): 46-51.
Gouldner AW. (1960) The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement.
American Sociological Review 25(2): 161-78.
Gribble KDK. (2001) Mother-to-mother support for women breastfeeding
in unusual circumstances: a new method for an old model. Breastfeeding
Review: professional publication of the Nursing Mothers’ Association of
Australia 9(3): 13-9.
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. (2006) How many interviews are enough?
An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods
18(1): 59-82.
Harrison MJ, Neufeld A, Kushner K. (1995) Women in transition: access and
barriers to social support. Journal of Advanced Nursing 21(5): 858-64.
Hegney D, Fallon T, O’Brien ML. (2008) Against all odds: a retrospective case
controlled study of women who experienced extraordinary breastfeeding
problems. Journal of Clinical Nursing 17(9): 1182-92.
Herron M, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG, Stockdale DJ. (2011) Ethical issues in
undertaking internet research of user-generated content: a review of the
literature. Evidence Based Midwifery 9(1): 9-15.
Herron M. (2013) A conceptual analysis and interpretation of women’s
experience of online breastfeeding support. Unpublished PhD thesis.
University of Ulster.
Hine C. (2008) Virtual ethnography: modes, varieties, affordances: In: Fielding
N, Lee RM, Blank G. (Eds.). The SAGE handbook of online research
methods. Sage: London.
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content
analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15(9): 1277-88.
Internet World Statistics. (2014) Internet usage statistics. See:
internetworldstats.com/stats.htm (accessed 10 August 2015).
LaCoursiere SP. (2001) A theory of online social support. Advances in Nursing
Science 24(1): 60-77.
Lampert MD, Ervin-Tripp SM. (1993) Structured coding for the study of
language and social interaction: In: Edwards JA, Lampert MD. (Eds.).
Talking data: transcription and coding in discourse research. Lawrence
Erlbaum: Hillsdale.
Landis JR, Koch GG. (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for
categorical data. Biometrics 33(1): 159-74.
Leahy-Warren P, Mulcahy H, Phelan A. (2009) A review of breastfeeding
support services provided by public health nurses in Ireland. See:
breastfeeding.ie/uploads/files/Review_of_Breastfeeding_Support_
Services_2009.pdf (accessed 10 August 2015).
Lin TC, Hsu JSC, Cheng HL, Chiu CM. (2015) Exploring the relationship
between receiving and offering online social support: a dual social support
model. Information & Management 52(3): 371-83.
Lombard M, Snyder-Duch J, Bracken CC. (2002) Content analysis in mass
communication. Human Communication Research 28(4): 587-604.
Meedya S, Fahy K, Kable A. (2010) Factors that positively influence
breastfeeding duration to six months: a literature review. Women and Birth
23(4): 135-45.
Murthy D. (2008) Digital ethnography: an examination of the use of new
technologies for social research. Sociology 42(5): 837-55.
Nelson AM. (2006) A metasynthesis of qualitative breastfeeding studies.
Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health 51(2): e13-e20.
Nowak MA, Roch S. (2007) Upstream reciprocity and the evolution of
gratitude. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological
Sciences 274(1610): 605-10.
O’Brien MR, Clark D. (2010) Use of unsolicited first person written illness
narratives in research: systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing
66(8): 1671-82.
O’Connor H, Madge C, Shaw R, Wellens J. (2008) Internet-based
interviewing: In: Fielding N, Lee RM, Blank G. (Eds.). The SAGE
handbook of online research methods. Sage: London.
O’Connor H, Madge C. (2001) Cyber-mothers: online synchronous interviewing
using conferencing software. Sociological Research Online 5(4).
Renfrew MJ, McCormick FM, Wade A, Quinn B, Dowswell T. (2012) Support
for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane
Database of Syst Rev 5: CD001141.
Rourke L, Anderson T, Garrison DR, Archer W. (2001) Methodological issues
in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International
Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 12(1): 8-22.
Salzer MS, Palmer SC, Kaplan K, Brusilovskiy E, ten Have T, Hampshire M,
Metz J, Coyne JC. (2010) A randomised, controlled study of internet peerto-
peer interactions among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.
Psycho-Oncology 19(4): 441-6.
Schmied V, Beake S, Sheehan A, McCourt C, Dykes F. (2011) Women’s
perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support: a metasynthesis.
Birth 38(1): 49-60.
Scott JA, Mostyn T. (2003) Women’s experiences of breastfeeding in a bottlefeeding
culture. Journal of Human Lactation 19(3): 270-7.
Scullard P, Peacock C, Davies P. (2010) Googling children’s health: reliability
of medical advice on the internet. Archives of Disease in Childhood
95(8): 580-2.
Stockdale J, Sinclair M, Kernohan WG, Keller JM. (2007) Exploring the
potential of the internet to motivate breastfeeding. Evidence Based
Midwifery 5(1): 10-5.
Suler J. (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior
7(3): 321-6.
Uehara ES. (1995) Reciprocity reconsidered: Gouldner’s moral norm
of reciprocity and social support. Journal of Social and Personal
Relationships 12(4): 483-502.
van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Lebrun CEI, Drossaers-Bakker
KW, Smit WM, Seydel E, van de Laar M. (2008) Coping with somatic
illnesses in online support groups: do the feared disadvantages actually
occur? Computers in Human Behavior 24(2): 309-24.
Walker LO, Avant KC. (2005) Strategies for theory construction in nursing
(fourth edition). Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Wasko MML, Faraj S. (2000) ‘It is what one does’: why people participate and
help others in electronic communities of practice. The Journal of Strategic
Information Systems 9(2): 155-73.

Keywords

  • Key words: Breastfeeding
  • support
  • online
  • mixed methods
  • concept analysis
  • antecedents
  • attributes
  • consequences
  • indirect
  • reciprocity
  • evidence-based midwifery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Tapping into authentic presence: key components arisingfrom a concept analysis of online breastfeeding support'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this