The 16 April 2016, MW 7.8 (MS 7.5) Ecuador earthquake: A quasi-repeat of the 1942 MS 7.5 earthquake and partial re-rupture of the 1906 MS 8.6 Colombia–Ecuador earthquake

Lingling Ye, Hiroo Kanamori, Jean Philippe Avouac, Linyan Li, Kwok Fai Cheung, Thorne Lay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

93 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The 2016 Ecuador MW7.8 earthquake ruptured the subduction zone boundary between the Nazca and South American plates. Joint modeling of seismic and tsunami observations indicates an ∼120 km long rupture area beneath the coastline north of the 1998 MW7.2 rupture. The slip distribution reveals two discrete asperities near the hypocenter and around the equator. Their locations and the patchy pattern are consistent with the prior interseismic geodetic strain, which showed highly locked patches also beneath the coastline. Aftershocks cluster along two streaks, one aligned nearly parallel to the plate convergence direction up-dip of the main slip patches, and the other on a trench-perpendicular lineation south of the 1958 rupture zone. Comparisons of seismic waveforms and magnitudes show that the 2016 event and 1942 earthquakes have similar surface wave magnitude (MS7.5), overlapping rupture areas, and similar main pulses of moment rate. The same area ruptured as the southernmost portion of the larger earthquake of 1906 (MW8.6, MS8.6). The seismic behavior reflects persistent heterogeneous frictional properties of the Colombia–Ecuador megathrust.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)248-258
Number of pages11
JournalEarth and Planetary Science Letters
Volume454
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 15 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • 2016 Ecuador earthquake
  • Ecuador–Colombia earthquake sequence
  • re-rupture of 1942 event
  • source rupture model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The 16 April 2016, MW 7.8 (MS 7.5) Ecuador earthquake: A quasi-repeat of the 1942 MS 7.5 earthquake and partial re-rupture of the 1906 MS 8.6 Colombia–Ecuador earthquake'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this