The adequacy and public perception of the public toilet provision on Guernsey

Patricia Mary McDermott, George Kernohan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In recent years there has been a decline in the state ofpublic toilets and, with over 50% of the public toiletsbeing closed, this has become a cause for public concern.Local authorities have no legal requirement to providepublic toilets and because of this some towns have nopublic toilet provision. The aim of this study was toinvestigate the adequacy and provision of the publictoilets on the Island of Guernsey. This investigation wasundertaken through observation of the 30 public toiletblocks and a questionnaire exploring the provision of thepublic toilets, emailed to a representative sample of theIsland population. All 18 of the toilets for those withdisabilities, 26 (out of 30) of the male and 27 (out of 30)of the female public toilets were observed and theresponse rate to the questionnaire was 48% (n=264).Results confirmed that there are an adequate number ofpublic toilet facilities for the Island’s population inaccordance with the British Standards. Fifty-five per centof respondents were satisfied or very satisfied with thenumber of facilities. However concerns were expressedabout the number of the public toilet that were closedduring the winter months and the proposed closure oftoilets in an effort to save money. The researchconcluded that the adequacy, provision and impressionof the public toilets on Guernsey was good, but moreattention needs to be given to year-round availabilityand the additional facilities required within them.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)59-67
JournalJournal of Environmental Health Research
Volume12
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2012

Bibliographical note

Reference text: Blackman T, Mitchell L, Burton E, Jenks M, Parsons
M, Raman S and Williams K (2003). ‘The accessibility
of public spaces for people with dementia: a new priority
for the ‘open city’, Disability & Society, 18 (3),pp.357-
371.
Booth C, Darke J and Yeandle S (1996) Changing
Places: Women’s Lives in the City, London: Paul
Chapman.
Bournemouth Borough Council (2005). Bournemouth
Seafront Public Toilet Satisfaction Survey. Bournemouth:
Bournemouth Borough Council. Available from:
http://www.bournemouth.gov.uk/textonly/Visitors/Seafr
ont/Seafront_Toilets.asp (Accessed 5th August 2010).
Brawley EC (1997). Designing for Alzheimer’s Disease.
Strategies for creating better care environments, New
York: Wiley.
British Toilet Association (2000). Public toilets in
England and Wales: Statistics from Audit Commission.
Winchester: British Toilet Association.
British Standards Institution (2006). BS6465 Part 1;
Code of practice for the design of sanitary facilities and
scales of provision of sanitary and associated appliances,
London: British Standards Institution.
British Standards Institution (2006). BS6465 Part 2;
Code of practice for space requirements for sanitary
appliances. London: British Standards Institution.
British Standards Institution (2010). BS6465 Part 4
DRAFT; Code of practice for the provision of public
toilets, London: British Standards Institution.
Cavanagh S and Ware V (1991). At Women’s
Convenience: A handbook on the design of Women’s
Public Toilets, London: Women’s Design Service.
Central Cities Institute (2002). Licensing Reform
London, University of Westminster, Central Cities
Institute.
Department for Communities and Local
Government (2008). Communities and Local
Government. The provision of public toilets, Twelfth
report of session 2007-2008. Report, together with
formal minutes, oral and written evidence. House of
Commons, London: The Stationery Office Ltd.
Disability Discrimination Act (1995). Disability
Discrimination Act 1995, London: Her Majesty's
Stationery Office.
Edwards J (1998). Policy making as organised
irresponsibility: the case of public conveniences, Policy
and Politics, 26 (3), pp.307-320
Environmental Protection Act (1990). Part II Waste on
Land, London, HMSO
Gillham B (2002). Real World Research Developing a
questionnaire, London: Continuum.
Greed C and Daniels I (2002). User and provider
perspectives on public toilet provision. Report of Nuffield
Trust Research, Occasional Paper, Faculty of the Built
Environment. Bristol: University of the West of England.
Greed C (2004). Public Toilets: The need to provide
compulsory provision. Municipal Engineer Proceedings of
the Institute of Civil Engineers, 157(Issue ME), pp.77-85.
Greed C (2005). Taking Stock: An overview of toilet
provision and standards, Bristol: University of the West of
England, Available from: http://kb.keepbritaintidy.org/
toilets/publications/stock.pdf (Accessed 27th July 2010).
Greshenson O and Penner B (2009). Ladies and Gents
Public Toilets and Gender, Philadelphia: Temple
University Press.
Hanson J, Begg N and Greed C (2007). The Accessible
Public Toilet Resource Manual, London: University
College London.
Heinze J E (1985). Bar soap and liquid soap. Journal of
the American Medical Association, 253 (11), p.1561.
Heinze J E and Yackovich F (1988). Washing with
contaminated bar soap is unlikely to transfer bacteria.
Epidemiology & Infection, 101 (2), pp.135-42.
Kabara J J and Brady M B (1984). Contamination of
bar soaps under "in use" condition. Journal of
Environmental Pathology, Toxicology and Oncology, 5
(4), pp.1-14.
Lanoë N (2002). Ogier’s reading research: How to make
research more approachable (3rd edition), London:
Baillière Tindall.
Lockwood J (2001). The lockwood Survey: capturing,
catering and caring for consumers, Huddersfield: Urban
Management Initiatives.
Miyanishi Y (1996). Comfortable public toilets: design and
maintenance manual, Toyama: City Planning Department.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2004). Access
and facilities for disabled people: Approved Document
M, London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
Oxford City Council (2009). Your Views on Public Toilets
in Oxford. Oxford: Oxford City Council Consultations,
Available from: http://consultation.oxford.gov.uk/
consult.ti/publictoilets/consultationHome (Accessed 5th
August 2010) (Internet).
Polit D and Beck CT (2008). Nursing Research:
Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice
(8th edition), London: Lippincott.
Public Health Act (1936). (1 Edw. VII, C.87), London:
HMSO.
Restroom Association (Singapore) (2006). A guide to
better public toilet design and maintenance, Singapore:
Restroom Association, Available from: www.toilet.org.sg
(Accessed 28th July 2010).
Salkind N J (2007). Statistics for people who (think they)
hate statistics (2nd edition), London: Sage.
Sex Discrimination Act (2008). The Sex Discrimination
Act 1975, Amendment Regulations 2008, London: Her
Majesty's Stationery Office.
States of Guernsey (2010). Guernsey Facts and Figures
2010, St Peter Port: Policy Council.
Thomas S A (2000). How to write health sciences
papers, dissertations and theses, London: Churchill
Livingstone.

Keywords

  • Public Toilets
  • WC
  • Lavatory
  • Antisocial
  • behaviour
  • Disabled Toilets

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The adequacy and public perception of the public toilet provision on Guernsey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this