The impact of two workplace-based health risk appraisal interventions on employee lifestyle parameters, mental health and work ability: results of a randomized controlled trial

K. Addley, S. Boyd, Robert Kerr, P. McQuillan, J. Houdmont, M. McCrory

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)


Health risk appraisals (HRA) are a common typeof workplace health promotion programmeoffered by American employers. In the UnitedKingdom, evidence of their effectiveness for promotinghealth behaviour change remains inconclusive.This randomized controlled trialexamined the effects of two HRA interventionson lifestyle parameters, mental health and workability in a UK context. A total of 180 employeeswere randomized into one of three groups:Group A (HRA augmented with health promotionand education activities), Group B (HRAonly) and Group C (control, no intervention).After 12months, changes in mean scoring in 10lifestyle, mental health and work ability indiceswere compared, Groups A and B demonstratednon-significant improvements in 70% and 80%,respectively, compared with controls (40%).Odds ratios revealed that, compared with thecontrol group, Group A was 29.2 (95% CI:9.22–92.27) times more likely to report a perceivedchange in lifestyle behaviour; Group B4.4 times (95% CI: 1.65–11.44). In conclusion,participation in the HRA was associated with ahigher likelihood of perceived lifestyle behaviourchange which was further increased in the augmentedHRA group, thereby providingpreliminary evidence that HRA and augmentedHRA in particular may helpUKemployeesmakepositive healthy lifestyle changes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)247-258
JournalHealth Education Research
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Bibliographical note

Reference text: 1. Lewis R, Dixon J. Rethinking management of chronic diseases.
Br Med J 2004; 328: 220–2.
2. Yach D, Hawkes C, Gould CL et al. The global burden of
chronic diseases: overcoming impediments to prevention
and control. J Am Med Assoc 2004; 291: 2616–22.
3. Spring B, Moller AC, Coons MJ. Multiple health behaviours:
overview and implications. J Public Health 2012;
34(Suppl. 1): i3–10.
4. Robroek SJW, van de Vathorst S, Hilhorst MT et al. Moral
issues in workplace health promotion. Int Arch Occup
Environ Health 2012; 85: 327–31.
5. Goetzel RZ, Ozminkowski RJ. The health and cost benefits
of work site health-promotion programs. Annu Rev Public
Health 2008; 29: 303–23.
6. Proper KI, Van Mechelen W. Effectiveness and Economic
Impact of Worksite Interventions to Promote Physical
Activity and Healthy Diet. Geneva: WHO Press, 2008.
7. Sorensen G, Barbeau E, Hunt MK et al. Reducing social
disparities in tobacco use: a social contextual model for reducing
tobacco use among blue-collar workers. Am J Public
Health 2004; 94: 230–9.
Impact of HRA interventions
Downloaded from at university of ulster on April 11, 2014
8. Goetzel RZ, Pronk NP. Worksite health promotion How
much do we really know about what works? Am J Prev
Med 2010; 38: 223–5.
9. Robroek SJ, van den Berg TI, Plat JF et al. The role of obesity
and lifestyle behaviours in a productive workforce. Occup
Environ Med 2011; 68: 134–9.
10. Schmier JK, Jones ML, Halpern MT. Cost of obesity in the
workplace. Scand J Work Environ Health 2006; 32: 5–11.
11. Schultz AB, Edington DW. Employee health and presenteeism:
a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil 2007; 17: 547–79.
12. Goetzel RZ, Ozminkowski RJ. Health and productivity management:
emerging opportunities for health promotion professionals
for the 21st century. Am J Health Promot 2000;
14: 211–4.
13. Goetzel RZ, Carls GS, Wang S et al. The relationship between
modifiable health risk factors and medical expenditures,
absenteeism, short-term disability, and presenteeism
among employees at Novartis. J Occup EnvironMed 2009;
51: 487–99.
14. Aldana SG. Financial impact of health promotion programs:
a comprehensive review of the literature. Am J Health
Promot 2001; 15: 296–320.
15. Chapman LS.Meta-evaluation of worksite health promotion
economic return studies: 2005 update. Am J Health Promot
2005; 19: 1–11.
16. Chapman LS.Meta-evaluation of worksite health promotion
economic return studies: 2012 update. Am J Health Promot
2012; 26: TAHP–1–12.
17. Riedel JE, Lynch W, Baase C et al. The effect of disease
prevention and health promotion on workplace productivity:
a literature review. Am J Health Promot 2001; 15: 167–91.
18. DaleyAJ, Parfitt G.Good health—is itworth it?Mood states,
physical well-being, job satisfaction and absenteeism in
members and non-members of British corporate health and
fitness clubs. J Occup Organ Psychol 1996; 69: 121–34.
19. Harden A, Peersman G, Oliver S et al. A systematic review
of the effectiveness of health promotion interventions in the
workplace. Occup Med (Lond) 1999; 49: 540–8.
20. Hillier D, Fewell F, CannWet al. Wellness at work: enhancing
the quality of our working lives. Int Rev Psychiatry
2005; 17: 419–31.
21. Mills PR. The development of a new corporate specific
health risk measurement instrument, and its use in investigating
the relationship between health and well-being and employee
productivity. Environ Health 2005; 4: 1.
22. McGillivray D. Health promotion in workplace: a missed
opportunity. Health Educ 2002; 120: 60–7.
23. Black C. Working for a Healthier Tomorrow. London: The
Stationery Office, 2007.
24. Cartwright S. Taking the pulse of executive health in the UK.
Acad Manag Exec 2000; 14: 16–24.
25. Department of Health. Public Health Responsibility Deal:
Health at Work, 2013. Available at: https://responsibility
Final.pdf. Accessed: 12 December 2013.
26. Health Promotion Agency. Work Well: Healthy Workplace
Guide, 2008. Available at: http://www.healthpromotiona
Assesment_08.pdf. Accessed: 12 December 2013.
27. Cowdery JE, Suggs LS, Parker S.Application of aweb-based
tailored health risk assessment in a work-site population.
Health Promot Pract 2007; 8: 88–95.
28. Soler RE, Leeks KD, Razi S et al. A systematic review of
selected interventions for worksite health promotion. Am J
Prev Med 2010; 38: S237–62.
29. Department for Work and Pensions. Dame Carol Black’s
Review of the Health of Britain’s Working Age Population:
Summary of Evidence Submitted, 2008. Available at: http://
summary.pdf. Accessed: 12 December 2013.
30. Wolf K. Health and productivity management in Europe. Int
J Workplace Health Manag 2008; 1: 136–44.
31. Reiso H, Nygard JF, Brage S et al.Work ability assessed by
patients and their GPs in new episodes of sickness certification.
Fam Pract 2000; 17: 139–44.
32. van den Berg TIJ, Elders LAM, de Zwart BCH et al. The
effects of work-related and individual factors on the Work
Ability Index: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med
2009; 66: 211–20.
33. Ilmarinen JE. Aging workers. Occup Environ Med 2001; 58:
34. Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A et al. Work Ability Index.
2nd revised edition. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of
Occupational Health, 1998.
35. World Health Organization. WHO (Five) Well Being Index.
Denmark: Psychiatric Research Unit, WHO Collaborating
Center for Mental Health, 1998.
36. Goldberg DP, Williams P. A User’s Guide to the General
Health Questionnaire. Windsor UK: NFER-Nelson
Publishing Company Ltd, 1991.
37. Keyes CLM. The Mental Health Continuum: From
Languishing to Flourishing in Life. J Health Social Behav
2002; 43: 207–22.
38. Fitech Limited. Fitech Counsellor Series. London: Fitech
Ltd, 1998.
39. Addley K, McQuillan P, Ruddle M. Creating healthy workplaces
in Northern Ireland: evaluation of a lifestyle and physical
activity assessment programme. Occup Med 2001; 51:
40. Bevan S. The Business Case for Employees’ Health and
Wellbeing. London: The Work Foundation, 2010.
41. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of selfchange
of smoking: toward an integrative model of change.
J Consult Clin Psychol 1983; 51: 390–5.
42. Prochaska JJ, Spring B, Nigg CR. Multiple health behaviour
change research: an introduction and overview. Prev Med
2008; 46: 181–8.
K. Addley et al.


Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of two workplace-based health risk appraisal interventions on employee lifestyle parameters, mental health and work ability: results of a randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this