Abstract
In this article, we argue that a set of unexpected contrasts in the interpretation of clitic-left-dislocated indefinites in Greek and Italian derive from structural variation in the nominal syntax of the two languages. Greek resists nonreferential indefinites in clitic left-dislocation, resorting to the topicalization of an often bare noun for nonreferential topics. By contrast, clitic left-dislocation is employed in Italian for topics regardless of their definite/indefinite interpretation. We argue that this contrast is directly linked to the wide availability of bare nouns in Greek, which stems from a structural difference in the nominal syntax of the two languages. In particular, we hypothesize that Greek nominal arguments lack a D layer. Rather, they are Number Phrases. We situate this analysis in the context of Chierchia’s (1998) typology of nominals. We argue that, on a par with Italian nouns, Greek nouns are [-arg, +pred]. However, they do not employ a syntactic head (D) for type-shifting to <e>. Rather, they resort to covert type-shifting, a hypothesis that is necessary to account for the distribution and interpretations of bare nouns in Greek, vis-à-vis other [-arg, +pred] languages like Italian and French.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 439-486 |
Number of pages | 48 |
Journal | Linguistic Inquiry |
Volume | 50 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2019 |
Keywords
- Greek
- Italian
- CLLD
- bare nouns
- DP
- NP
- nominal mapping parameter
- Indefinites
- Nominal syntax
- Clitic left-dislocation
- Bare nouns