Variable Pricing Through Revenue Management: A Critical Evaluation of Affective Outcomes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)


Purpose – Numerous studies have measured short-term behavioural response to variable pricing, but affective responses have been under-researched. Trust is a focal point for this research, which assesses the affective consequence of variable pricing as applied using revenue management techniques. This paper aims to address this issue.Design/methodology/approach – A longitudinal, quantitative approach was used to measure respondents' level of trust. The sample was divided into a control group which received constant price messages, and an experimental group, which received variable price messages. In stage one, respondents were presented with hypothetical scenarios of restaurant pricing over a period of six weeks. In stage two, a hotel chain's database was used to send control and experimental messages over a period of six months.Findings – There is mixed evidence for the proposition that variable pricing leads to distrust by consumers. While there was evidence for this in stage one, the evidence from stage two was more complex. A profile emerged of relatively young, male, highly educated frequent purchasers who were more likely to trust a company using variable pricing compared with older, female, infrequent purchasers of lower educational attainment.Research limitations/implications – It is probably not variable pricing itself that leads to mistrust of a company, but an individual's knowledge of the “rules” by which variable pricing operates. The high levels of trust recorded by younger, highly educated frequent purchasers suggests acceptance by them of the rules of variable pricing, and the benefits and problems associated with the practice.Practical implications – This research informs management strategies that seek ever-finer price discrimination through the use of customer databases and individually targeted price offers. Some customer segments may be amenable to variable pricing and will happily play along with the company's “rules”. Other groups may not understand such rules, and in these circumstances may distrust a company that practises variable pricing.Originality/value – This study uses a longitudinal approach to measure issues of trust and fairness perceived in companies' efforts at price discrimination. Previous studies have tended to measure the success of variable pricing/revenue management practices through short-term measures of behavioural response (e.g. increase in sales). This study incorporates an affective measure into the assessment of consumers' response to variable pricing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-199
JournalManagement Research News
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Bibliographical note

Reference text: Bull, C. (2003), ‘‘Strategic issues in customer relationship management (CRM) implementation’’,
Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 9 No. 5, pp. 592-602.
Butler, J.K. (1991), ‘‘Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: evolution of a
conditions of trust inventory’’, Journal of Management, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 643-63.
Chow, S. and Holden, R. (1997), ‘‘Toward and understanding of loyalty: the moderating role of
trust’’, Journal of Managerial Studies, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 275-98.
de Chernatony, L. and McDonald, M. (2003), Creating Powerful Brands, 3rd ed., Elsevier Science
and Technology, Oxford.
Dooney, P.M. and Cannon, J.P. (1997), ‘‘An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller
relationships’’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61, pp. 35-51.
Dwyer, F.R., Schurr, P.H. and Oh, S. (1987), ‘‘Developing buyer-seller relationships’’, Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 51 No. April, pp. 11-27.
Garbarino, E. and Lee, O.F. (2003), ‘‘Dynamic pricing in internet retail: effects on consumer trust’’,
Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 495-513.
Gabarro, J.J. (1978), ‘‘The development of trust, influence and expectations’’, in Athos, A.G. and
Gabarro, J.J. (Eds), Interpersonal Behaviour: Communication and Understanding in
Relationships, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Grayson, K. and Ambler, T. (1999), ‘‘The dark side of long-term relationships in marketing
services’’, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 36 No. 1, p. 132.
Luck, D. and Lancaster, G. (2003), ‘‘E-CRM: customer relationship marketing in the hotel
industry’’, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 213-31.
Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S.D. (1994), ‘‘The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing’’,
Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 No. July, pp. 20-38.
McMahon- Beattie, U. and Yeoman, I. (2004), Revenue Management and Pricing, Thomson
Learning, London.
Streitfeld, D. (2000), On the Web, Price Tags Blur, Washington Post, September 27, p. A01.
Varey, R. and Ballantyne, D. (2005), ‘‘Relationship marketing and the challenge of dialogical
interaction’’, Journal of Relationship Marketing, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 13-30.
Wolverton, T. (2000), Some customers are fuming over random discounts on some
of the e-tailer’s most popular DVD’s, News.Com, available at:
1017-245326.html?tag¼rn (accessed 7 November 2002).
Further reading
Ganesan, S. (1994), ‘‘Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships’’, Journal
of Marketing, Vol. 58 No. April, pp. 1-19.
Muther, A. (2002), ‘‘Customer relationship management: Electronic customer care in the new
economy’’, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 532-3.


Dive into the research topics of 'Variable Pricing Through Revenue Management: A Critical Evaluation of Affective Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this